Wednesday 

Room 3 

13:40 - 14:40 

(UTC+02

Talk (60 min)

Memory Safety: Rust vs. C

Memory safety is a prerequisite for both safety and security. Memory safe languages such as Rust promise to improve security compared to established languages such as C and C++. Do these claims stand up to scrutiny? Which language should you choose for your next project?

C
Rust

Robert Seacord

Robert C. Seacord is the Standardization Lead at Woven Planet he works on the Software Craft. Robert was previously a Technical Director at NCC Group, Secure Coding Manager at Carnegie Mellon's Software Engineering Institute, and an adjunct professor in the School of Computer Science and the Information Networking Institute at Carnegie Mellon University.

He is the author of seven books, including Effective C: An Introduction to Professional C Programming (No Starch Press, 2020), The CERT C Coding Standard, Second Edition (Addison-Wesley, 2014) Secure Coding in C and C++, Second Edition (Addison-Wesley, 2013), and Java Coding Guidelines: 75 Recommendations for Reliable and Secure Programs (Addison-Wesley, 2014). He has also published more than 50 papers on software security, component-based software engineering, Web-based system design, legacy-system modernization, component repositories and search engines, and user interface design and development. Robert has been teaching secure coding in C and C++ to private industry, academia, and government since 2005. He started programming professionally for IBM in 1982, working in communications and operating system software, processor development, and software engineering and also has worked at the X Consortium, where he developed and maintained code for the Common Desktop Environment and the X Window System. Robert is on the Advisory Board for the Linux Foundation is an expert at the ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG14 international standardization working group for the C programming language.